Readers! This precise writing is my perspective to introduce Ali Sina and the kinds of games he is playing with the intellects of
common Muslims. Firstly, I do not have a sickness like Ali Sina to bombard my readers with irrelevant materials unless
otherwise required to build the case for the subject. Secondly, in order for me to be diverse from Ali Sina where he never sticks
to the subject matter and as a result confounds readers. You will not go undergo any stupefaction in my editorials as I do not
have anything to conceal from the readers; similarly, there is no need to perplex my readers as well. Such handiworks are only
from people like Ali Sina who stand on the shaky ground of “faith” and when they do not stumble upon something to prop up
their perverted atheistic beliefs they start talking nineteen to the dozen. Every article of his, are perfect examples of such
handiworks.
In this precise paper you will find ample of ad hominem and tu quoque logical fallacies pertaining to Ali Sina; as he himself is a
great user of them against Allah, Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) and other Muslim Brothers, however he always
discards them from being accepted in the form of evidences (Please go through any of his debates). I am not aware why? Why
am I using them? This is merely a tit for tat. He hit my Allah, my Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) and my Holy Quran; I
hit him back. I am not sure about other Muslims; however, I was never brought up on a notion to “to turn other cheek”.
It is very compulsory to introduce Ali Sina prior going into the subject matter. This is required for building up my case therefore
please do not contemplate it as Ali Sina’s sickness of going out of track is creeping up on me. This is a core part of this article.
While reading articles engraved by Ali Sina and his allies; there are many people who are not very well aware of any concealed
games that are being played by these people. Over here I am going to divulge those concealed deceits which are bewildering
the intellects of common people with their writings. I will present before you proofs and evidences in unfolding this whodunit.
Ex-Muslims: Useless On Both Sides:
Readers! If you scan through the website of Ali Sina you will stumble on scores of statements scattered all over his website
hollering that more people are leaving Islam now (I do not have to provide any evidence as it is out and out on his website.
Read any of his articles). I do not deem this statement is bona fide, looks more like a fib from “FATHER OF FALSEHOOD”,
once again. I will provide you with my elucidation down in my paper that why do I feel that it is not a stanch testimony.
I agree to this theory without any arguments that there might be a chance that one or two Muslims leave Islam; however, such
incidents only occur once in a blue moon. And those so-called Muslims who left Islam are even of no advantageous for him as
well; for a reason, as those dumb-witted so-called Muslims who disguise themselves in an attire of “free-thinker”, never took an
opportunity to explore their own religion in depth ever in their disgusting lives. Consequently, how are they going to be true
“followers” of his dogma in any case; Ali Sina knows alone. Besides, they believed Ali Sina who is in himself a biggest fibber
that I have ever seen. They never checked Ali Sina’s credibility of deception he preaches and allotted primacy to populace like
him, over Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him). The time they squander heeding to and delve into people like Ali Sina; if
they would have ever expended much less time on exploring Islam then they would have a very different perspective all in all.
Why they did more research on Ali Sina then doing it on Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him)? I am not aware of that.
Also, Ali Sina’s perverted messages are not reaching vast majority of Muslims as most of the Islamic countries have banned his
website; therefore, who is he actually converting? Donkeys!?
Readers! A little knowledge is very dangerous rather than having no knowledge. When a person does not have any knowledge
of a particular subject then his brain tends to believe anything put in front of him. In this situation, he is not able to negate it
because he has no erudition of that. Naturally taking a positive approach he tries to accept everything and never argues.
Besides a person who has a very little knowledge of that precise subject; such a person is a menace to himself and to the
associates he is preaching to. When something is put in front of him which actually going against his doctrine, he naturally tries
to defend it providing lame excuses and proofs. If he fails and surely he fails; but naturally in the end he tends to believe in it.
He never bothers to take an extra step and check the credibility of the statement put forth. For example; try this scenario at
home with your younger brother or sister or with your friend or with any stranger. Tell him/her that mountains do not have roots
and provide your evidences and proofs from children’s school websites. Also give him/her your lame explanations, logics and
proofs that why mountains CANNOT have roots. If he/she does not have any knowledge of mountains he/she tends to believe
in you and will never ever check the credibility of your statements because you have already showed him/her the false proofs
(children’s websites in case of Ali Sina). Good part is that he/she will never argue with you. Besides a person who has little
knowledge of mountains; he/she will either accept or negate with your logics. However, if he/she negates then he/she will bow
down at last when you show him/her the false proofs. This is what Ali Sina did and it worked pretty well for him. This is what
happened to me, at first. At the outset I tend to believe everything from Ali Sina; however, I took an extra step and explore the
credibility of his claims and at last and by the grace of Allah I have found the truth. This extra step is where all these ex-Muslims
are lacking much. They never bend their intellect in searching for truth and they always listen to the arguments of one party
which is sure an injustice from their side.
Readers! What is the outcome of having little knowledge of any subject? Here I will provide you one example from Ali Sina’s
own article "World's Greatest Showman" where he said,
“One of these eight “Muslim” Noble Prize winners is the Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz. One of his best known works,
Children of Gebelawi (1959), has been banned in Egypt for alleged blashphemy. In 1994 at the age of 82 yrs Mahfouz was
stabbed by a man of Allah. When asked if he has ever read any of Mahfouz’s books, the servant of Allah responded; “I never
read any of his filthy books” (Source).
This “servant of Allah” is definitely an outcome of “having little knowledge” and I condemn such an act. However, whatever
blasphemous was written by Naguib Mahfouz against God, I condemn that as well. Process to be followed is to bring him to
Islamic Justice and there should be definite ruling passed against him after evaluating evidence. No one has an authority to
inflict pain to others on a personal basis by-passing the established jurisdiction. And also no one has an authority to ridicule
someone’s loved ones. We Muslims love Allah and his messenger Prophet Muhammad
(Peace be upon him) very much and if some one mocks them, it would definitely make our blood boil. Similarly, if I pass some
dire remarks against the mother, sister or wife of Ali Sina whom he loves so much; then I expect him to be raged as a result. If
he ever has a chance to meet me (may be on judgment day) then I expect him to definitely throw me a punch as a punishment.
Similarly we revere Allah and his messenger Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) more than our parents and other loved
ones; therefore no one has an authority to ridicule them without any proofs. Punishment for blasphemy is present in almost
every religion (Please search Internet). However, Naguib Mahfouz did not die because of stabbing and he survived for 12
years more with permanently affected nerves in his right hand. He later died in August 2006 by sustaining an injury to his head
as a result of a fall; plus kidney problems, ulcer and cardiac failure (Source).
Readers! It was always very big news for me when I hear anyone leaving Islam because I never thought of someone leaving
such a beautiful religion. However I have broadened my intellect now as I have found out that there are some fools and stupid
in every religion. When I started reading Ali Sina's articles on his website, they made me very upset at first, and I started having
doubts in my faith and millions of questions arose in my mind. Afterwards, I thought of checking credence of his writings; if they
are actually correct or not. And as my doubts were right, every thing he wrote on his website is incorrect, full of lies and pure
deception. Then I repent to Allah for having slightest of doubts in my faith. In this particular scenario I did not limit myself only to
Ali Sina; however I paid attention to other side’s story as well which seemed to be more authentic and logical; my Beloved
Prophet
Mohammed's (Peace be upon him) story.
Readers! On Ali Sina’s website “words are filtering through him”; similarly Islam presented by Ali Sina on his website is
filtered solely through him
supported by no authorities. Why these ex-Muslims never explored their own religion Islam filtered through Prophet Mohammed
(Peace be upon him)? Why they are more biased toward people like Ali Sina than Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him)?
This is injustice from their side. If some one says that I have given an equal time to both parties in exploring their views and
beliefs and found out that Islam is wrong; then it is a lie from him. I want him to show me a single verse from Holy Quran that
could give him an excuse to leave such a beautiful religion. Subsequently, I give him my words that I will leave Islam myself if he
presents me such a verse.
These ex-Muslims believed people like Ali Sina who do not even have any book, intellectuals, and codes, authorities to support
their twisted beliefs; over a Holy Book Quran that actually gives you answer of every question and provide you with the best
code of life. I would really like to remind Ali Sina that he is wasting his time in converting such so-called Muslims to his faith;
since they were already puny in their own religion before, so they will remain the same in his faith. Again little knowledge is
dangerous; and as they were a danger for Islam before, so they will be a hazard to him when they join his cult. It is like they
have chosen not to obey any discipline and rather rummage around like animals. Who likes to incorporate such puny soldiers
in his army who are indeed of no help? Rather they will put everyone at high risk. Besides, people who join the fold of Islam are
more staunchly devoted to their religion and they practice more rigidly than a born Muslim. If you consider this scenario, Islam
is again winning and getting stronger and people like Ali Sina are loosing and getting weak. It is an absolute fact that Islam is
the fastest growing religion in the world; so get over it (Source 1) (Source 2). Numerically, people leaving Islam are negligible in
regards to people joining it. Therefore we do not require those ex-Muslims for our strength as they are of no help when they
were Muslims and they will remain useless when they leave Islam. Congratulations to Ali Sina for having such people. They are
merely providing head counts and nothing at all. So, why we worry? However, people who join Islam are more devoted than a
born Muslim which is an absolute fact and Ali Sina is aware of that. We take responsibility that we Muslims have failed to deliver
the correct message to these ex-Muslims before; however it is more of their own responsibility to check their own religion prior
believing people like Ali Sina. Allah has given everyone intellect to judge right and wrong.
Ali Sina: Father Of Deceptions:
As you all are acquainted with Ali Sina very well and the website he is running. If you ever have an opportunity to read any of
his debates with Muslims
on his website you will realize that whenever he commences a debate; after some while you will discern that the core area of
discussion is no where to be seen, seems dangling in the air with no tracks to follow at all and he tries his level best not to
cotton on your idea of belief and you are not able to comprehend his faith in that particular subject as well. This will be a never-
ending anecdote where you will not be able to persuade him ever and I am certain about that, no matter you afford him with
ample of logics, proofs and evidences; yet he will never concur. He has already geared up his bent wits beforehand, to never
to greet any logical explanations pertaining to Islam and never to concur with his adversaries no matter if they are true. Above
and beyond, he will fire up other extraneous subjects which will be miles apart from the actual subject and will be neither here
nor there. This is
the ammunition he brings into play to salvage his back and such tactics muddles up readers as well, where they by and large
overlook the real subject and start deeming about “new stuff” hoist by him. If you will not be able to outdistance his challenge
(which I am sure you can never do that) then it will be a win for him. He will never ever bend his intellect and try to comprehend
your idea of belief; besides he will start blabbering in disagreement to that as you must have witnessed in the case of
“Mountains have roots” which I cited above. Such people are already revealed in Quran as “najas” نجس in this place:
“O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And
if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” (Quran 9:28)
In this specific verse Quran is articulating about people like Ali Sina, who are “unclean” in their creeds. They will never ever
heed your rational elucidations and terminologies and, in turn, they will injure the intellects of common Muslims. Muslims should
abstain from them. They have no faith, no book, and no authority to shore up their lewd terminologies, intellects and warped
atheistic beliefs. They are just out there to mock Islam and that’s
all. Such people should not be given any credence as they DO NOT HAVE ANY SUPPORTIVE AUTHORITIES TO PROVIDE
EVIDENCE AND PROOF OF THEIR UNDERSTANDING.
Ali Sina Speaking Nineteen To Dozen:
Readers! Please mull over this scenario where I am playing “Ali Sina”;
I am governing a website (like a tyrant) in opposition to your religion and I have proffered a remuneration of $50,000 if so you
can corroborate me erroneous on my beliefs against your religion, afterwards this reward will be yours (Source). And if you ask
me to deposit this money to a third party so to be making it neutral, just, fair and portraying me as a true person; then I will not
do that. If you ask me of any assurance and guarantee that I will pay the money if you prove me erroneous and fraud at the
end of the discussion; then I will not provide you any guarantee but you have to take me for my words
Ali Sina: As for the payment after being defeated you must take me for my word. (Source).
In short, I will not let go off my money from my custody and it will never abscond from my den; when I die I will haul this money
with me to gutter, oops a
slip-up, grave. However, if you “win” (whisper: which surely you cannot) then I “promise” (loudly) that I will grant you the money.
If you, in spite of everything, remain be adamant and inquiring concerning the money then I will pose you a question,
Ali Sina: Suppose I lie and there is no money. Won’t you like to clear your prophet from these charges? Isn’t defending Islam
enough incentive for you? I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE MY TIME DISCUSSING ON THIS MATTER (meaning money matter)
(Source)
Hence, you should not fret concerning the money but to put all your vigor in nullifying the notions and how to bail out your
prophet from accusations that I have set forth hostile to him. Conversely, $50,000 is fairly a huge sum of money as a prize and
watching it departing out of my hands will not be ever painless for me. Hence, what should I do instead? I will try by no means
to be induced on any explanations, logics, and proofs presented to me in favor of your religion. I will aim my level best to
negate every leeway of concordance in respect to your religion and shall start presenting misinterpretations, endow with
warped scientific logics and discard any evidences without even verifying the credibility. No matter, if you even afford me with
the truthful interpretations, accurate scientific logics and verified evidences; I will never ever concur to your theory.
To spice up such a game in which I am always the winner, if you ever dare to corner me using my own imaginative statements
then I will set off other subjects which would be miles apart from the actual discussion and this would only to baffle you and the
readers. I will bombard you with all the ammunition I have and will never furnish any chance for you to ever raise your head
from the ground. I will insult you, your God, your prophets, your holy books, your family and your fellow Muslims and I will not let
you do anything about it on my website. I will not take any orders from you. This is my website, my territory, my burrow, my
home and I will do what ever I want to do; so you better agree to it what ever I say and believe.
Ali Sina: This is my site and I do what I please. I do this to humiliate you Muslims (Source).
Thus, you are invited to my hideout (website) to have a debate IN WRITING ONLY with me on your religion; but please keep in
your mind beforehand that you will never win the quest
Ali Sina: You can bet your life that you are going to lose this debate. This is to prove to the Muslims that the reason their
scholars shun me is not because they think what I say is not relevant or not important but because they know they have no
CHANCE OF WINNING THE DEBATE with me (Source).
The whole quest is mine where I am the juror, judge and executioner. You have to agree to my beliefs and not vice versa.
And for sure, I will not expose myself in public for a reason that I am too “chicken” and I am afraid that my life would be at peril
once I bare myself. I have no idea why Muslims still did not slay Dr. William Campbell, Shri Shri Ravi Shankar, Pastor Sjoberg,
Jimmy Swaggart, Floyd E. Clark, Anis Shorosh, Eric B. Bock, Bishop Wakefield, Robert Douglas and several other orators yet,
who had argued with Muslims IN PUBLIC.
In short, for having a debate with me you have to agree to my conditions and not vice versa. For the same reason I have also
hidden my name behind
another label which is “Ali Sina” as I do not want to reveal my true identity again for the same reason that I am too “chicken”
and gravely timorous that someday a “fanatic” “Muslim” will exterminate me once I reveal myself. The name I have applied to
myself is actually a kind of mask that I am wearing to bury my true-self and at the same time, to call everyone else ugly by
keeping myself still behind it. Yes! You can ask me about my faith and what I believe in; the answer is I have no faith, no book,
no intellectuals and no authorities to support my logics, interpretations and evidences but I use my mind (which came into
existence by chance); however, I have an utmost authority to question your faith, your book, your intellectuals and your
authorities and in turn you cannot ask me concerning who actually afforded me this authority.
Now, the debate is over and I have won it, no matter what ever you say, but I am the winner Period! Afterwards, I will advertise
your debate with me in my later articles and this is just only to ridicule you and your religion. Readers! This is Mr. Ali Sina
babbling nineteen to dozen.
Concealed Truth; Now Revealed:
There are many people whom Ali Sina had debated and such dialogues are not available on his website (if available then they
are curtailed and veiled in archives). Insinuating, he is concealing them from general public since he was thrown into dung
already by our Muslim brothers. For example;
Ali Sina's Debate With Brother Yamin Zakaria (For some unknown reasons this particular domain is down. I will update
this link once it is available)
Ali Sina's Debate With Brother Nadir Ahmed
After examining these two debates (there are others more) you will come to discern that he never bows to any truth whenever a
Muslim corners him using his own imaginative statements. Either he never replies; or otherwise bombards illogical statements
in his rebuttals and confounds people by switching on topics other than what is being discussed. This is his ammo and no
matter how much you request him to keep on the topic he will never do that and furnishes you with millions of excuses. Motive!
This is meant to be a lucid defeat on his side and that is how he steers clear of being a looser.
Readers! My impression is not to dissuade anyone who is eager to have a debate with Ali Sina; it is tabligh and beyond any
doubts, Allah will reward
you for your deeds. However, the modes all the debates are posted on his website allure a discrete perspective and propel a
fallacious message to Muslim community. Nevertheless, my perspective is poles apart as it is unquestionably a devoted Muslim’
s perspective, and I retain this approach in tact, whenever I scan one of his debates on his website. But what about the
common Muslim who has very partial knowledge about his religion; he will indisputably deem that Islam is absolutely loosing
here as he has a different perspective and he is also not aware of the technicalities and deceptions used by Ali Sina to turn the
tables. He is reading those debates having a neutral perception; plus lack of Islamic knowledge does nothing more but put
more fuel to fire. This yet again harms the intellect of common Muslim and he starts having doubts in his faith. At a snail's pace,
this poison starts streaming through his veins and subsequently it surmounts his judgments and there comes a time where he
alters into Ali Sina and no logic infiltrates his brain. No matter how much you strive to influence him, he will never regard you
since he is already been brain washed by people like Ali Sina and every concept of his starts with negative perspective in
respect to Islam. This is the treacherous game playing by populace like Ali Sina.
The dilemma lies in Ali Sina; where your words are sifting through him and then being posted on “HIS” website with “HIS” own
intentions and whatever “MANNER” he chooses. Where he always stars himself as Judge, Juror and Executioner at the same
time (a beautiful term rightly used for Ali Sina by Brother Yamin Zakaria). Ali Sina said in one of his debates;
“Please keep in mind that you are talking to an ex-Muslim who can read the Muslims like an open book and not a dhimmi. I
know the Muslim mind. They love to order you what to do. They are all bullies and I am an expert in taming bullies. So please
drop this attitude of telling me what to do. THIS IS MY SITE AND I DO WHAT I PLEASE. You get more with me than a non-
Muslim would ever get from a Muslim. For this you must be grateful. I do not do this because I am obliged or bound by silly PC
laws. I DO THIS TO HUMILIATE YOU MUSLIMS. Please don’t even try to bully and demand things from me. I am trying to
teach the world how to deal with Muslims.” (Source)
He manipulates your ideas, terminologies and perspectives in such a way that they all go into his own favor. Here is one
example from his recent debate with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed Ghamdi VS Ali Sina. Brother Zaheer Ahmed wrote,
“I and Mr. Ali Sina have agreed on a few things. We’ve agreed that unlike what was happening before, each message from our
side is going to be posted in an unbroken form immediately after it has been received, even if the next response is posted
within a span of a few hours of that posting. I believe that it is unfair that message should be broken by a participant into
different passages with each passage being followed by the other participant’s rebuttal.” “Each message from now on is going
to talk about one subject only. It’s not going to be of more than one thousand words” (Source).
Ali Sina acceded with the request and wrote,
“it seems to me that Dr. Zaheer is under the impression that by presenting the debate in a different format, the readers will
come to a different conclusion. I sincerely doubt that but as I promised to him, I will publish his articles first in their entirely and
then respond to them section by section, even if this means publishing them twice” (Source).
Brother Zaheer Ahmed TWICE made requests to post his arguments as a whole and not in broken format. And after two
requests Ali Sina did what was asked.
Readers! This part is very worthy of note where Brother Zaheer Ahmed wrote to Ali Sina,
“I must say however, that I am both amazed and slightly disappointed at your quick, almost immediate responses to my
messages. The problem with your swiftness in responding is that it doesn’t allow you any time to digest my point of view. Even if
I was to take your word that my view is completely unworthy of your consideration, you still need to spend some time thinking
about it” (Source).
Readers! You must have been convinced by now that Ali Sina never gives credence to other party’s arguments. Every twisted
answer is already geared up in his infinitesimal brain and never gives any credibility to other people’s words. It took me five
months to write a reply "World's Greatest Jester", and I am pretty sure that it might have taken only FIVE DAYS for Ali Sina to
scribble down his article "World's Greatest Showman". The foremost disparity you will glimpse in these both articles (and also in
my later articles as well) is; EVIDENCE. You will not find a single provable and logical evidence from Ali Sina, where as, I never
utter anything in against devoid of engendering any proofs and acceptable logics. I always do a comprehensive research prior
jotting down anything about it, no matter how much time it consumes; or else I keep my mouth shut. It is more humiliating being
rapt on a falsehood or presenting fabricated evidences rather than keeping mum on that subject. In case of Ali Sina, it is other
way around. Gathering evidences take hell lot of time; that is why the responses from Ali Sina are very abrupt as they lack the
staple chunk of acquiescence which is EVIDENCE. Let’s take an example; if you say to Ali Sina that 2+2=4. Instantly, a
chemical reaction takes place in his mind that compels him to negate and prove this equation wide of the mark. After falling
short to actually accomplish that; he never concurs to your equation that 2+2=4 is indeed accurate nor he says it is off beam;
what he does, he keeps his mouth shut and starts ranting about equations like 2+2=5 or 2+2=3 which are miles apart from the
actual equation and baffles readers.
Readers! In this exemplar I will present a very little touch of Ali Sina’s insight of Arabic Language that how adept is he in this
domain; you will discover far more “attention-grabbing” “own” interpretations by “Professor” Ali Sina in my forth coming article
"Ali Sina: Self-Styled Professor Of Arabic". The example is from the same debate with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed
Ghamdi. Ali Sina said,
“I also highlight the pronouns. We see sometimes Allah refers to himself in third person singular, (He) then shifts to first person
plural (We) and sometimes to first person singular (I and Me). Will you please explain this unorthodox way of speech?”
(Source)
In Arabic (Quran), Hebrew and Greek (Bible) languages the notion of plural is employed as a “mode of respect” and this is the
basic knowledge of these languages which Ali Sina is not aware of, at all. You will see the same type of “way of speech” in Bible
as well. Please find below a verse from Bible.
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and
over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the
earth.” (Genesis 1:26)
In this precise verse, God of Bible has used “us” and “our” for Himself which is certainly in plural form. Likewise, in this
particular verse God is conversing with reference to creating only one man in His own image, and then later in this verse why
did He use “them” for just only one man? This is
a well-founded blunder that can be questioned from Jews & Christians? However, the person who is aware of these languages
will never ever heave such questions as he realizes that such notions are all parts of speech. And this is how all the scriptures
were printed initially. Hence, Ali Sina is not authorized to raise such allegations against Arabic language as he is an illiterate in
this explicit discipline. If his mother tongue has limitations and boundaries then it is the dilemma of his lingo. I am not aware of
which language he speaks and what is his mother tongue; however it seems either his language has limitations or he does not
know very much about his own dialect. Why is he employing his own language rules to the languages of Holy Scriptures?
Readers! If you examine this particular debate you will come to know that Ali Sina nicely ensnared Brother Zaheer Ahmed into
numerous dissimilar topics and the actual subject (of intercession) was no where to be seen. At least I dub this a first victory for
Ali Sina if I keep myself unbiased. This is one of his best shots which continuously lead him to self-implied “victory” in such
kinds of dialogues. Subsequently, you will perceive as well that later it would change to self-claimed “victory” as he undeniably
referenced such debates in his later articles. This the same line of attack, where he references his debates with Mr. Ayotallah
Montazari and several other renowned personalities and avows it as his “victory” in his later articles. For example Ali Sina says,
“Not a single person has won the debates with me, not because I am a highly skilled debater, but because I debate from the
position of strength. It is easy to win when you speak the truth and your opponent does not”. (Source)
Readers! Please read the debate by hand, and roll up to a conclusion yourselves. Regarding his “Position of Strength” is
clearly evident in here.
Readers! If you scan through several debates of our Muslim Brothers with Ali Sina you will perceive that he always bring into
play the factor of “insult” in his writings again and again in order to irk the other party. If you examine Ali Sina’s postings from
the perspective of a common Muslim, you will assuredly make your blood boiled instantly. No matter how much you advise him
not to draw on the factor of “insult” in his writings, yet he never takes note of it and crops up lame excuses. Such a disgusting
mind and traits Ali Sina has. I wonder if he ever reveres his own family members and associates. This is one of the tactics of his
self-claimed “victories” over Muslims. For that reason, I am also using the same tactic of insult for him as well, but naturally tit
for tat. For a proof, read any of his writings; more evidently read one of his debates.
Dilemma lies here, where you are having dialogues with him on “his owned” territory (website) and you are expecting him to
surrender to your faith. This not going to happen ever and the same decree applies to Ali Sina as well, as he would not expect
any Muslim also to surrender if he is having a dialogue on Muslim territory; as you must have seen in the debates with Brother
Yamin Zakaria and Brother Nadir Ahmed. In the case of Brother Yamin Zakaria; Ali Sina clogged his replies once he felt that he
was being cornered and he also did not post the full debate on his website as was truly done by Brother Yamin Zakaria. In the
case of Brother Nadir Ahmed; Ali Sina did not answer his questions and again stopped replying. This is all the game of
perception. ALI SINA NEVER ACCEPTS HIS DEFEAT ON HIS OWNED TERRITORY AND NEVER REPLIES BACK ON MUSLIM
TERRITORY IF HE IS BEING CORNERED. This is documented fact and you can mark my words as well. For proofs; please
read both the debates.
Readers! I will give you one example from the same debate of Ali Sina with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed Ghamdi that
how Ali Sina manipulates words, twist meanings and how he shorn off the core idea deliberately. Brother Zaheer Ahmed said,
“Muslims were directed to kill the Idolaters of Arabia if they did not accept faith and to let the Jews and Christians live on their
own religions if they accepted to pay jizyah (the non-Muslim tax) and live a life of total subjugation to the Islamic State
established in Arabia. However, the active adversaries among them were put to death or exiled whenever it became possible”
(Source).
However, if you look at the response of Ali Sina pertaining to above explanation you will notice that he gave the perception that
Allah had ordained Muslims to kill “every” non-Muslim. He deliberately discarded the ideas of “live but pay jizyah” and “only
active adversaries were put to death or exiled”. He misconstrued the whole concept and wrote that all the non-Muslims should
be put to death. He wrote,
“This seems to be a gross miscalculation on the part of Allah, who appoints fallible people to judge the faith of others and if in
their opinion it does not
measure up, kill them. Consequently Muslims, following this directive, engage in acts of terrorism and wage war against others
and each other. It is natural that each person thinks he has found the truth. These directives of Allah entitle them to declare
war on those who do not think like them and kill
them, with clarity of conscience thinking that they are doing God’s work. It is irrational to believe that God needs humans to do
what should be strictly his work” (Source).
This is how his minuscule mind works and this is how he injures the intellects of other common people. This is pure fraud from
his side.
There are many other items of interest in his writings where I could effortlessly pin him down in a debate by being playing
“picky”. However I have preferred a different format by writing articles in response to his inscriptions and let them post on a
different location. This way my writings will remain
uncontaminated, have an apposite meaning and people can comprehend easily and as a whole. This is my conception. At the
outset, I considered having a debate with Ali Sina on his website candidly, and I was confident that I could easily knocked him
out by the grace of Allah as I am more “aggressive” than him and I seldom play “defensive” (these two are the qualities of Ali
Sina as well). But I thought of giving it a more time and afterwards checked Ali Sina’s credence and verified his false claims
against Quran and Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) from other authentic sources. Unsurprisingly, I found all of them
bogus and him as charlatan and hoaxer. Then I knew how he plays his game (in the example I mentioned above). He
manipulates meanings, twists words and bluntly lies to people. Thus, it was very unlikely for me to have a win or at least
convince him on my faith on his own website, and therefore decided to put my writings on a different website and let people
read them WITHOUT any
manipulations.
The sole way out to this quandary as I can see is; once you are through with the debate then re-read the whole writings of Ali
Sina and I am sure you will hit upon millions of contradictions lies and fibs from him. Please highlight them with your comments
and let them post on the popular website of your choice. Advertise it, and on Ali Sina’s forum as well and let the world see the
actual truth. If Ali Sina is not playing your game then defeat him by playing his own game. If you utter a lie again and again then
there will be a time when it becomes truth; this is what Ali Sina does very well.
Readers! Please recall that I have notified you earlier in this paper that Ali Sina had a debate with Brother Nadir Ahmed of
www.examinethetruth.com
and in that debate Brother Nadir Ahmed really showed Ali Sina the “light” and it was a really great defeat and humiliation for Ali
Sina and a great win for Islam. During the debate both parties had decided to post the dialogues on their respective websites
for public viewing. When debate was finished and during it Brother Nadir Ahmed never gave a chance to Ali Sina to ever raise
his head from his gutter; Nadir truly posted the whole debate, as it is, on his website (which I already gave you the link earlier in
this paper). However, “unsurprisingly”; after a few months of debate, Ali Sina wrote to Brother Nadir Ahmed that “someone”
hacked his website and he lost the debate. Brother Nadir Ahmed made a great deal of ridicule out of this sham. To hide his
humiliation, after some time, Ali Sina again wrote to Brother Nadir Ahmed that one of his “disciples” “fortunately” had a backup
of the debate and he would post it soon. (I can provide readers a written evidence of this correspondence upon request. I do
not know if it bears any credence if it is from Nadir’s website. At least Ali Sina can deny it afterwards). Here is the link of the
debate Ali Sina has posted on his website.
Brother Nadir Ahmed VS Ali Sina - As posted on Ali Sina's Website (PLEASE DO NOT CLICK IT FOR NOW)
Some facts about this debate on Ali Sina’s website:
My counsel to readers is to have a debate at neutral location with a defined format. My intention is not to demoralize you but
just to make an impression that the venue is not correct and it is not neutral. However if you have already decided to have a
debate with him on his owned website, then please mark my words that you will never going to win and, in turn, this will defame
Islam. Therefore desist it. May Allah guide you all to the very right path!
End ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to the section of Suhail Khalid
Send Email to Suhail Khalid
common Muslims. Firstly, I do not have a sickness like Ali Sina to bombard my readers with irrelevant materials unless
otherwise required to build the case for the subject. Secondly, in order for me to be diverse from Ali Sina where he never sticks
to the subject matter and as a result confounds readers. You will not go undergo any stupefaction in my editorials as I do not
have anything to conceal from the readers; similarly, there is no need to perplex my readers as well. Such handiworks are only
from people like Ali Sina who stand on the shaky ground of “faith” and when they do not stumble upon something to prop up
their perverted atheistic beliefs they start talking nineteen to the dozen. Every article of his, are perfect examples of such
handiworks.
In this precise paper you will find ample of ad hominem and tu quoque logical fallacies pertaining to Ali Sina; as he himself is a
great user of them against Allah, Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) and other Muslim Brothers, however he always
discards them from being accepted in the form of evidences (Please go through any of his debates). I am not aware why? Why
am I using them? This is merely a tit for tat. He hit my Allah, my Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) and my Holy Quran; I
hit him back. I am not sure about other Muslims; however, I was never brought up on a notion to “to turn other cheek”.
It is very compulsory to introduce Ali Sina prior going into the subject matter. This is required for building up my case therefore
please do not contemplate it as Ali Sina’s sickness of going out of track is creeping up on me. This is a core part of this article.
While reading articles engraved by Ali Sina and his allies; there are many people who are not very well aware of any concealed
games that are being played by these people. Over here I am going to divulge those concealed deceits which are bewildering
the intellects of common people with their writings. I will present before you proofs and evidences in unfolding this whodunit.
Ex-Muslims: Useless On Both Sides:
Readers! If you scan through the website of Ali Sina you will stumble on scores of statements scattered all over his website
hollering that more people are leaving Islam now (I do not have to provide any evidence as it is out and out on his website.
Read any of his articles). I do not deem this statement is bona fide, looks more like a fib from “FATHER OF FALSEHOOD”,
once again. I will provide you with my elucidation down in my paper that why do I feel that it is not a stanch testimony.
I agree to this theory without any arguments that there might be a chance that one or two Muslims leave Islam; however, such
incidents only occur once in a blue moon. And those so-called Muslims who left Islam are even of no advantageous for him as
well; for a reason, as those dumb-witted so-called Muslims who disguise themselves in an attire of “free-thinker”, never took an
opportunity to explore their own religion in depth ever in their disgusting lives. Consequently, how are they going to be true
“followers” of his dogma in any case; Ali Sina knows alone. Besides, they believed Ali Sina who is in himself a biggest fibber
that I have ever seen. They never checked Ali Sina’s credibility of deception he preaches and allotted primacy to populace like
him, over Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him). The time they squander heeding to and delve into people like Ali Sina; if
they would have ever expended much less time on exploring Islam then they would have a very different perspective all in all.
Why they did more research on Ali Sina then doing it on Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him)? I am not aware of that.
Also, Ali Sina’s perverted messages are not reaching vast majority of Muslims as most of the Islamic countries have banned his
website; therefore, who is he actually converting? Donkeys!?
Readers! A little knowledge is very dangerous rather than having no knowledge. When a person does not have any knowledge
of a particular subject then his brain tends to believe anything put in front of him. In this situation, he is not able to negate it
because he has no erudition of that. Naturally taking a positive approach he tries to accept everything and never argues.
Besides a person who has a very little knowledge of that precise subject; such a person is a menace to himself and to the
associates he is preaching to. When something is put in front of him which actually going against his doctrine, he naturally tries
to defend it providing lame excuses and proofs. If he fails and surely he fails; but naturally in the end he tends to believe in it.
He never bothers to take an extra step and check the credibility of the statement put forth. For example; try this scenario at
home with your younger brother or sister or with your friend or with any stranger. Tell him/her that mountains do not have roots
and provide your evidences and proofs from children’s school websites. Also give him/her your lame explanations, logics and
proofs that why mountains CANNOT have roots. If he/she does not have any knowledge of mountains he/she tends to believe
in you and will never ever check the credibility of your statements because you have already showed him/her the false proofs
(children’s websites in case of Ali Sina). Good part is that he/she will never argue with you. Besides a person who has little
knowledge of mountains; he/she will either accept or negate with your logics. However, if he/she negates then he/she will bow
down at last when you show him/her the false proofs. This is what Ali Sina did and it worked pretty well for him. This is what
happened to me, at first. At the outset I tend to believe everything from Ali Sina; however, I took an extra step and explore the
credibility of his claims and at last and by the grace of Allah I have found the truth. This extra step is where all these ex-Muslims
are lacking much. They never bend their intellect in searching for truth and they always listen to the arguments of one party
which is sure an injustice from their side.
Readers! What is the outcome of having little knowledge of any subject? Here I will provide you one example from Ali Sina’s
own article "World's Greatest Showman" where he said,
“One of these eight “Muslim” Noble Prize winners is the Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz. One of his best known works,
Children of Gebelawi (1959), has been banned in Egypt for alleged blashphemy. In 1994 at the age of 82 yrs Mahfouz was
stabbed by a man of Allah. When asked if he has ever read any of Mahfouz’s books, the servant of Allah responded; “I never
read any of his filthy books” (Source).
This “servant of Allah” is definitely an outcome of “having little knowledge” and I condemn such an act. However, whatever
blasphemous was written by Naguib Mahfouz against God, I condemn that as well. Process to be followed is to bring him to
Islamic Justice and there should be definite ruling passed against him after evaluating evidence. No one has an authority to
inflict pain to others on a personal basis by-passing the established jurisdiction. And also no one has an authority to ridicule
someone’s loved ones. We Muslims love Allah and his messenger Prophet Muhammad
(Peace be upon him) very much and if some one mocks them, it would definitely make our blood boil. Similarly, if I pass some
dire remarks against the mother, sister or wife of Ali Sina whom he loves so much; then I expect him to be raged as a result. If
he ever has a chance to meet me (may be on judgment day) then I expect him to definitely throw me a punch as a punishment.
Similarly we revere Allah and his messenger Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him) more than our parents and other loved
ones; therefore no one has an authority to ridicule them without any proofs. Punishment for blasphemy is present in almost
every religion (Please search Internet). However, Naguib Mahfouz did not die because of stabbing and he survived for 12
years more with permanently affected nerves in his right hand. He later died in August 2006 by sustaining an injury to his head
as a result of a fall; plus kidney problems, ulcer and cardiac failure (Source).
Readers! It was always very big news for me when I hear anyone leaving Islam because I never thought of someone leaving
such a beautiful religion. However I have broadened my intellect now as I have found out that there are some fools and stupid
in every religion. When I started reading Ali Sina's articles on his website, they made me very upset at first, and I started having
doubts in my faith and millions of questions arose in my mind. Afterwards, I thought of checking credence of his writings; if they
are actually correct or not. And as my doubts were right, every thing he wrote on his website is incorrect, full of lies and pure
deception. Then I repent to Allah for having slightest of doubts in my faith. In this particular scenario I did not limit myself only to
Ali Sina; however I paid attention to other side’s story as well which seemed to be more authentic and logical; my Beloved
Prophet
Mohammed's (Peace be upon him) story.
Readers! On Ali Sina’s website “words are filtering through him”; similarly Islam presented by Ali Sina on his website is
filtered solely through him
supported by no authorities. Why these ex-Muslims never explored their own religion Islam filtered through Prophet Mohammed
(Peace be upon him)? Why they are more biased toward people like Ali Sina than Prophet Mohammed (Peace be upon him)?
This is injustice from their side. If some one says that I have given an equal time to both parties in exploring their views and
beliefs and found out that Islam is wrong; then it is a lie from him. I want him to show me a single verse from Holy Quran that
could give him an excuse to leave such a beautiful religion. Subsequently, I give him my words that I will leave Islam myself if he
presents me such a verse.
These ex-Muslims believed people like Ali Sina who do not even have any book, intellectuals, and codes, authorities to support
their twisted beliefs; over a Holy Book Quran that actually gives you answer of every question and provide you with the best
code of life. I would really like to remind Ali Sina that he is wasting his time in converting such so-called Muslims to his faith;
since they were already puny in their own religion before, so they will remain the same in his faith. Again little knowledge is
dangerous; and as they were a danger for Islam before, so they will be a hazard to him when they join his cult. It is like they
have chosen not to obey any discipline and rather rummage around like animals. Who likes to incorporate such puny soldiers
in his army who are indeed of no help? Rather they will put everyone at high risk. Besides, people who join the fold of Islam are
more staunchly devoted to their religion and they practice more rigidly than a born Muslim. If you consider this scenario, Islam
is again winning and getting stronger and people like Ali Sina are loosing and getting weak. It is an absolute fact that Islam is
the fastest growing religion in the world; so get over it (Source 1) (Source 2). Numerically, people leaving Islam are negligible in
regards to people joining it. Therefore we do not require those ex-Muslims for our strength as they are of no help when they
were Muslims and they will remain useless when they leave Islam. Congratulations to Ali Sina for having such people. They are
merely providing head counts and nothing at all. So, why we worry? However, people who join Islam are more devoted than a
born Muslim which is an absolute fact and Ali Sina is aware of that. We take responsibility that we Muslims have failed to deliver
the correct message to these ex-Muslims before; however it is more of their own responsibility to check their own religion prior
believing people like Ali Sina. Allah has given everyone intellect to judge right and wrong.
Ali Sina: Father Of Deceptions:
As you all are acquainted with Ali Sina very well and the website he is running. If you ever have an opportunity to read any of
his debates with Muslims
on his website you will realize that whenever he commences a debate; after some while you will discern that the core area of
discussion is no where to be seen, seems dangling in the air with no tracks to follow at all and he tries his level best not to
cotton on your idea of belief and you are not able to comprehend his faith in that particular subject as well. This will be a never-
ending anecdote where you will not be able to persuade him ever and I am certain about that, no matter you afford him with
ample of logics, proofs and evidences; yet he will never concur. He has already geared up his bent wits beforehand, to never
to greet any logical explanations pertaining to Islam and never to concur with his adversaries no matter if they are true. Above
and beyond, he will fire up other extraneous subjects which will be miles apart from the actual subject and will be neither here
nor there. This is
the ammunition he brings into play to salvage his back and such tactics muddles up readers as well, where they by and large
overlook the real subject and start deeming about “new stuff” hoist by him. If you will not be able to outdistance his challenge
(which I am sure you can never do that) then it will be a win for him. He will never ever bend his intellect and try to comprehend
your idea of belief; besides he will start blabbering in disagreement to that as you must have witnessed in the case of
“Mountains have roots” which I cited above. Such people are already revealed in Quran as “najas” نجس in this place:
“O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And
if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise.” (Quran 9:28)
In this specific verse Quran is articulating about people like Ali Sina, who are “unclean” in their creeds. They will never ever
heed your rational elucidations and terminologies and, in turn, they will injure the intellects of common Muslims. Muslims should
abstain from them. They have no faith, no book, and no authority to shore up their lewd terminologies, intellects and warped
atheistic beliefs. They are just out there to mock Islam and that’s
all. Such people should not be given any credence as they DO NOT HAVE ANY SUPPORTIVE AUTHORITIES TO PROVIDE
EVIDENCE AND PROOF OF THEIR UNDERSTANDING.
Ali Sina Speaking Nineteen To Dozen:
Readers! Please mull over this scenario where I am playing “Ali Sina”;
I am governing a website (like a tyrant) in opposition to your religion and I have proffered a remuneration of $50,000 if so you
can corroborate me erroneous on my beliefs against your religion, afterwards this reward will be yours (Source). And if you ask
me to deposit this money to a third party so to be making it neutral, just, fair and portraying me as a true person; then I will not
do that. If you ask me of any assurance and guarantee that I will pay the money if you prove me erroneous and fraud at the
end of the discussion; then I will not provide you any guarantee but you have to take me for my words
Ali Sina: As for the payment after being defeated you must take me for my word. (Source).
In short, I will not let go off my money from my custody and it will never abscond from my den; when I die I will haul this money
with me to gutter, oops a
slip-up, grave. However, if you “win” (whisper: which surely you cannot) then I “promise” (loudly) that I will grant you the money.
If you, in spite of everything, remain be adamant and inquiring concerning the money then I will pose you a question,
Ali Sina: Suppose I lie and there is no money. Won’t you like to clear your prophet from these charges? Isn’t defending Islam
enough incentive for you? I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE MY TIME DISCUSSING ON THIS MATTER (meaning money matter)
(Source)
Hence, you should not fret concerning the money but to put all your vigor in nullifying the notions and how to bail out your
prophet from accusations that I have set forth hostile to him. Conversely, $50,000 is fairly a huge sum of money as a prize and
watching it departing out of my hands will not be ever painless for me. Hence, what should I do instead? I will try by no means
to be induced on any explanations, logics, and proofs presented to me in favor of your religion. I will aim my level best to
negate every leeway of concordance in respect to your religion and shall start presenting misinterpretations, endow with
warped scientific logics and discard any evidences without even verifying the credibility. No matter, if you even afford me with
the truthful interpretations, accurate scientific logics and verified evidences; I will never ever concur to your theory.
To spice up such a game in which I am always the winner, if you ever dare to corner me using my own imaginative statements
then I will set off other subjects which would be miles apart from the actual discussion and this would only to baffle you and the
readers. I will bombard you with all the ammunition I have and will never furnish any chance for you to ever raise your head
from the ground. I will insult you, your God, your prophets, your holy books, your family and your fellow Muslims and I will not let
you do anything about it on my website. I will not take any orders from you. This is my website, my territory, my burrow, my
home and I will do what ever I want to do; so you better agree to it what ever I say and believe.
Ali Sina: This is my site and I do what I please. I do this to humiliate you Muslims (Source).
Thus, you are invited to my hideout (website) to have a debate IN WRITING ONLY with me on your religion; but please keep in
your mind beforehand that you will never win the quest
Ali Sina: You can bet your life that you are going to lose this debate. This is to prove to the Muslims that the reason their
scholars shun me is not because they think what I say is not relevant or not important but because they know they have no
CHANCE OF WINNING THE DEBATE with me (Source).
The whole quest is mine where I am the juror, judge and executioner. You have to agree to my beliefs and not vice versa.
And for sure, I will not expose myself in public for a reason that I am too “chicken” and I am afraid that my life would be at peril
once I bare myself. I have no idea why Muslims still did not slay Dr. William Campbell, Shri Shri Ravi Shankar, Pastor Sjoberg,
Jimmy Swaggart, Floyd E. Clark, Anis Shorosh, Eric B. Bock, Bishop Wakefield, Robert Douglas and several other orators yet,
who had argued with Muslims IN PUBLIC.
In short, for having a debate with me you have to agree to my conditions and not vice versa. For the same reason I have also
hidden my name behind
another label which is “Ali Sina” as I do not want to reveal my true identity again for the same reason that I am too “chicken”
and gravely timorous that someday a “fanatic” “Muslim” will exterminate me once I reveal myself. The name I have applied to
myself is actually a kind of mask that I am wearing to bury my true-self and at the same time, to call everyone else ugly by
keeping myself still behind it. Yes! You can ask me about my faith and what I believe in; the answer is I have no faith, no book,
no intellectuals and no authorities to support my logics, interpretations and evidences but I use my mind (which came into
existence by chance); however, I have an utmost authority to question your faith, your book, your intellectuals and your
authorities and in turn you cannot ask me concerning who actually afforded me this authority.
Now, the debate is over and I have won it, no matter what ever you say, but I am the winner Period! Afterwards, I will advertise
your debate with me in my later articles and this is just only to ridicule you and your religion. Readers! This is Mr. Ali Sina
babbling nineteen to dozen.
Concealed Truth; Now Revealed:
There are many people whom Ali Sina had debated and such dialogues are not available on his website (if available then they
are curtailed and veiled in archives). Insinuating, he is concealing them from general public since he was thrown into dung
already by our Muslim brothers. For example;
Ali Sina's Debate With Brother Yamin Zakaria (For some unknown reasons this particular domain is down. I will update
this link once it is available)
Ali Sina's Debate With Brother Nadir Ahmed
After examining these two debates (there are others more) you will come to discern that he never bows to any truth whenever a
Muslim corners him using his own imaginative statements. Either he never replies; or otherwise bombards illogical statements
in his rebuttals and confounds people by switching on topics other than what is being discussed. This is his ammo and no
matter how much you request him to keep on the topic he will never do that and furnishes you with millions of excuses. Motive!
This is meant to be a lucid defeat on his side and that is how he steers clear of being a looser.
Readers! My impression is not to dissuade anyone who is eager to have a debate with Ali Sina; it is tabligh and beyond any
doubts, Allah will reward
you for your deeds. However, the modes all the debates are posted on his website allure a discrete perspective and propel a
fallacious message to Muslim community. Nevertheless, my perspective is poles apart as it is unquestionably a devoted Muslim’
s perspective, and I retain this approach in tact, whenever I scan one of his debates on his website. But what about the
common Muslim who has very partial knowledge about his religion; he will indisputably deem that Islam is absolutely loosing
here as he has a different perspective and he is also not aware of the technicalities and deceptions used by Ali Sina to turn the
tables. He is reading those debates having a neutral perception; plus lack of Islamic knowledge does nothing more but put
more fuel to fire. This yet again harms the intellect of common Muslim and he starts having doubts in his faith. At a snail's pace,
this poison starts streaming through his veins and subsequently it surmounts his judgments and there comes a time where he
alters into Ali Sina and no logic infiltrates his brain. No matter how much you strive to influence him, he will never regard you
since he is already been brain washed by people like Ali Sina and every concept of his starts with negative perspective in
respect to Islam. This is the treacherous game playing by populace like Ali Sina.
The dilemma lies in Ali Sina; where your words are sifting through him and then being posted on “HIS” website with “HIS” own
intentions and whatever “MANNER” he chooses. Where he always stars himself as Judge, Juror and Executioner at the same
time (a beautiful term rightly used for Ali Sina by Brother Yamin Zakaria). Ali Sina said in one of his debates;
“Please keep in mind that you are talking to an ex-Muslim who can read the Muslims like an open book and not a dhimmi. I
know the Muslim mind. They love to order you what to do. They are all bullies and I am an expert in taming bullies. So please
drop this attitude of telling me what to do. THIS IS MY SITE AND I DO WHAT I PLEASE. You get more with me than a non-
Muslim would ever get from a Muslim. For this you must be grateful. I do not do this because I am obliged or bound by silly PC
laws. I DO THIS TO HUMILIATE YOU MUSLIMS. Please don’t even try to bully and demand things from me. I am trying to
teach the world how to deal with Muslims.” (Source)
He manipulates your ideas, terminologies and perspectives in such a way that they all go into his own favor. Here is one
example from his recent debate with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed Ghamdi VS Ali Sina. Brother Zaheer Ahmed wrote,
“I and Mr. Ali Sina have agreed on a few things. We’ve agreed that unlike what was happening before, each message from our
side is going to be posted in an unbroken form immediately after it has been received, even if the next response is posted
within a span of a few hours of that posting. I believe that it is unfair that message should be broken by a participant into
different passages with each passage being followed by the other participant’s rebuttal.” “Each message from now on is going
to talk about one subject only. It’s not going to be of more than one thousand words” (Source).
Ali Sina acceded with the request and wrote,
“it seems to me that Dr. Zaheer is under the impression that by presenting the debate in a different format, the readers will
come to a different conclusion. I sincerely doubt that but as I promised to him, I will publish his articles first in their entirely and
then respond to them section by section, even if this means publishing them twice” (Source).
Brother Zaheer Ahmed TWICE made requests to post his arguments as a whole and not in broken format. And after two
requests Ali Sina did what was asked.
Readers! This part is very worthy of note where Brother Zaheer Ahmed wrote to Ali Sina,
“I must say however, that I am both amazed and slightly disappointed at your quick, almost immediate responses to my
messages. The problem with your swiftness in responding is that it doesn’t allow you any time to digest my point of view. Even if
I was to take your word that my view is completely unworthy of your consideration, you still need to spend some time thinking
about it” (Source).
Readers! You must have been convinced by now that Ali Sina never gives credence to other party’s arguments. Every twisted
answer is already geared up in his infinitesimal brain and never gives any credibility to other people’s words. It took me five
months to write a reply "World's Greatest Jester", and I am pretty sure that it might have taken only FIVE DAYS for Ali Sina to
scribble down his article "World's Greatest Showman". The foremost disparity you will glimpse in these both articles (and also in
my later articles as well) is; EVIDENCE. You will not find a single provable and logical evidence from Ali Sina, where as, I never
utter anything in against devoid of engendering any proofs and acceptable logics. I always do a comprehensive research prior
jotting down anything about it, no matter how much time it consumes; or else I keep my mouth shut. It is more humiliating being
rapt on a falsehood or presenting fabricated evidences rather than keeping mum on that subject. In case of Ali Sina, it is other
way around. Gathering evidences take hell lot of time; that is why the responses from Ali Sina are very abrupt as they lack the
staple chunk of acquiescence which is EVIDENCE. Let’s take an example; if you say to Ali Sina that 2+2=4. Instantly, a
chemical reaction takes place in his mind that compels him to negate and prove this equation wide of the mark. After falling
short to actually accomplish that; he never concurs to your equation that 2+2=4 is indeed accurate nor he says it is off beam;
what he does, he keeps his mouth shut and starts ranting about equations like 2+2=5 or 2+2=3 which are miles apart from the
actual equation and baffles readers.
Readers! In this exemplar I will present a very little touch of Ali Sina’s insight of Arabic Language that how adept is he in this
domain; you will discover far more “attention-grabbing” “own” interpretations by “Professor” Ali Sina in my forth coming article
"Ali Sina: Self-Styled Professor Of Arabic". The example is from the same debate with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed
Ghamdi. Ali Sina said,
“I also highlight the pronouns. We see sometimes Allah refers to himself in third person singular, (He) then shifts to first person
plural (We) and sometimes to first person singular (I and Me). Will you please explain this unorthodox way of speech?”
(Source)
In Arabic (Quran), Hebrew and Greek (Bible) languages the notion of plural is employed as a “mode of respect” and this is the
basic knowledge of these languages which Ali Sina is not aware of, at all. You will see the same type of “way of speech” in Bible
as well. Please find below a verse from Bible.
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and
over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the
earth.” (Genesis 1:26)
In this precise verse, God of Bible has used “us” and “our” for Himself which is certainly in plural form. Likewise, in this
particular verse God is conversing with reference to creating only one man in His own image, and then later in this verse why
did He use “them” for just only one man? This is
a well-founded blunder that can be questioned from Jews & Christians? However, the person who is aware of these languages
will never ever heave such questions as he realizes that such notions are all parts of speech. And this is how all the scriptures
were printed initially. Hence, Ali Sina is not authorized to raise such allegations against Arabic language as he is an illiterate in
this explicit discipline. If his mother tongue has limitations and boundaries then it is the dilemma of his lingo. I am not aware of
which language he speaks and what is his mother tongue; however it seems either his language has limitations or he does not
know very much about his own dialect. Why is he employing his own language rules to the languages of Holy Scriptures?
Readers! If you examine this particular debate you will come to know that Ali Sina nicely ensnared Brother Zaheer Ahmed into
numerous dissimilar topics and the actual subject (of intercession) was no where to be seen. At least I dub this a first victory for
Ali Sina if I keep myself unbiased. This is one of his best shots which continuously lead him to self-implied “victory” in such
kinds of dialogues. Subsequently, you will perceive as well that later it would change to self-claimed “victory” as he undeniably
referenced such debates in his later articles. This the same line of attack, where he references his debates with Mr. Ayotallah
Montazari and several other renowned personalities and avows it as his “victory” in his later articles. For example Ali Sina says,
“Not a single person has won the debates with me, not because I am a highly skilled debater, but because I debate from the
position of strength. It is easy to win when you speak the truth and your opponent does not”. (Source)
Readers! Please read the debate by hand, and roll up to a conclusion yourselves. Regarding his “Position of Strength” is
clearly evident in here.
Readers! If you scan through several debates of our Muslim Brothers with Ali Sina you will perceive that he always bring into
play the factor of “insult” in his writings again and again in order to irk the other party. If you examine Ali Sina’s postings from
the perspective of a common Muslim, you will assuredly make your blood boiled instantly. No matter how much you advise him
not to draw on the factor of “insult” in his writings, yet he never takes note of it and crops up lame excuses. Such a disgusting
mind and traits Ali Sina has. I wonder if he ever reveres his own family members and associates. This is one of the tactics of his
self-claimed “victories” over Muslims. For that reason, I am also using the same tactic of insult for him as well, but naturally tit
for tat. For a proof, read any of his writings; more evidently read one of his debates.
Dilemma lies here, where you are having dialogues with him on “his owned” territory (website) and you are expecting him to
surrender to your faith. This not going to happen ever and the same decree applies to Ali Sina as well, as he would not expect
any Muslim also to surrender if he is having a dialogue on Muslim territory; as you must have seen in the debates with Brother
Yamin Zakaria and Brother Nadir Ahmed. In the case of Brother Yamin Zakaria; Ali Sina clogged his replies once he felt that he
was being cornered and he also did not post the full debate on his website as was truly done by Brother Yamin Zakaria. In the
case of Brother Nadir Ahmed; Ali Sina did not answer his questions and again stopped replying. This is all the game of
perception. ALI SINA NEVER ACCEPTS HIS DEFEAT ON HIS OWNED TERRITORY AND NEVER REPLIES BACK ON MUSLIM
TERRITORY IF HE IS BEING CORNERED. This is documented fact and you can mark my words as well. For proofs; please
read both the debates.
Readers! I will give you one example from the same debate of Ali Sina with Brother Zaheer Ahmed & Dr. Javed Ghamdi that
how Ali Sina manipulates words, twist meanings and how he shorn off the core idea deliberately. Brother Zaheer Ahmed said,
“Muslims were directed to kill the Idolaters of Arabia if they did not accept faith and to let the Jews and Christians live on their
own religions if they accepted to pay jizyah (the non-Muslim tax) and live a life of total subjugation to the Islamic State
established in Arabia. However, the active adversaries among them were put to death or exiled whenever it became possible”
(Source).
However, if you look at the response of Ali Sina pertaining to above explanation you will notice that he gave the perception that
Allah had ordained Muslims to kill “every” non-Muslim. He deliberately discarded the ideas of “live but pay jizyah” and “only
active adversaries were put to death or exiled”. He misconstrued the whole concept and wrote that all the non-Muslims should
be put to death. He wrote,
“This seems to be a gross miscalculation on the part of Allah, who appoints fallible people to judge the faith of others and if in
their opinion it does not
measure up, kill them. Consequently Muslims, following this directive, engage in acts of terrorism and wage war against others
and each other. It is natural that each person thinks he has found the truth. These directives of Allah entitle them to declare
war on those who do not think like them and kill
them, with clarity of conscience thinking that they are doing God’s work. It is irrational to believe that God needs humans to do
what should be strictly his work” (Source).
This is how his minuscule mind works and this is how he injures the intellects of other common people. This is pure fraud from
his side.
There are many other items of interest in his writings where I could effortlessly pin him down in a debate by being playing
“picky”. However I have preferred a different format by writing articles in response to his inscriptions and let them post on a
different location. This way my writings will remain
uncontaminated, have an apposite meaning and people can comprehend easily and as a whole. This is my conception. At the
outset, I considered having a debate with Ali Sina on his website candidly, and I was confident that I could easily knocked him
out by the grace of Allah as I am more “aggressive” than him and I seldom play “defensive” (these two are the qualities of Ali
Sina as well). But I thought of giving it a more time and afterwards checked Ali Sina’s credence and verified his false claims
against Quran and Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) from other authentic sources. Unsurprisingly, I found all of them
bogus and him as charlatan and hoaxer. Then I knew how he plays his game (in the example I mentioned above). He
manipulates meanings, twists words and bluntly lies to people. Thus, it was very unlikely for me to have a win or at least
convince him on my faith on his own website, and therefore decided to put my writings on a different website and let people
read them WITHOUT any
manipulations.
The sole way out to this quandary as I can see is; once you are through with the debate then re-read the whole writings of Ali
Sina and I am sure you will hit upon millions of contradictions lies and fibs from him. Please highlight them with your comments
and let them post on the popular website of your choice. Advertise it, and on Ali Sina’s forum as well and let the world see the
actual truth. If Ali Sina is not playing your game then defeat him by playing his own game. If you utter a lie again and again then
there will be a time when it becomes truth; this is what Ali Sina does very well.
Readers! Please recall that I have notified you earlier in this paper that Ali Sina had a debate with Brother Nadir Ahmed of
www.examinethetruth.com
and in that debate Brother Nadir Ahmed really showed Ali Sina the “light” and it was a really great defeat and humiliation for Ali
Sina and a great win for Islam. During the debate both parties had decided to post the dialogues on their respective websites
for public viewing. When debate was finished and during it Brother Nadir Ahmed never gave a chance to Ali Sina to ever raise
his head from his gutter; Nadir truly posted the whole debate, as it is, on his website (which I already gave you the link earlier in
this paper). However, “unsurprisingly”; after a few months of debate, Ali Sina wrote to Brother Nadir Ahmed that “someone”
hacked his website and he lost the debate. Brother Nadir Ahmed made a great deal of ridicule out of this sham. To hide his
humiliation, after some time, Ali Sina again wrote to Brother Nadir Ahmed that one of his “disciples” “fortunately” had a backup
of the debate and he would post it soon. (I can provide readers a written evidence of this correspondence upon request. I do
not know if it bears any credence if it is from Nadir’s website. At least Ali Sina can deny it afterwards). Here is the link of the
debate Ali Sina has posted on his website.
Brother Nadir Ahmed VS Ali Sina - As posted on Ali Sina's Website (PLEASE DO NOT CLICK IT FOR NOW)
Some facts about this debate on Ali Sina’s website:
- First of all it is very difficult to access this debate on Ali Sina’s website.
- I request readers to access this debate on Ali Sina’s website without clicking the link I provided. I want to see how easily
you find your way to this debate.
- I do not want you to read it. Just visit the page and go through every page randomly and you will see the design in which
it was posted on Ali Sina’s website.
- Ali Sina posted this debate with user comments in it.
- Making it impossible for the readers to find Brother Nadir Ahmed’s words.
- Even Ali Sina did not change the fonts and their colors or highlight them to make the respective words more visible.
- This is clear-cut evidence that he wanted to hide such debates from public and his “disciples”.
- Readers! I can provide you million similar examples from his website and his lies, fibs and contradictions. May be I will
write another article specifically for this subject.
My counsel to readers is to have a debate at neutral location with a defined format. My intention is not to demoralize you but
just to make an impression that the venue is not correct and it is not neutral. However if you have already decided to have a
debate with him on his owned website, then please mark my words that you will never going to win and, in turn, this will defame
Islam. Therefore desist it. May Allah guide you all to the very right path!
End ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to the section of Suhail Khalid
Send Email to Suhail Khalid
| Answering FaithFreedom.org |
| Ali Sina: Jackass of All, Master of None |